A bunch of conditional judgments based on different manufacturers. , becoming more and more bloated and difficult to maintain. Development classmates are complaining, and their cooperation with product managers will naturally drop a lot. What's the problem? When something goes wrong, you naturally have to figure out how to "pass the blame." So is this a problem with product students or development students? Personally, I think they all have problems, but the product is the source and the responsibility is greater.
As a product manager, you should have business foresight. In this case, IoT devices are hardware devices. As a company operator, you will definitely consider the cost of hardware procurement, product quality and stability. Therefore, it is very likely that equipment Argentina WhatsApp Number from other manufacturers will be used instead. Moreover, a big feature of IoT devices is that after the equipment has been deployed, it may be distributed in various places across the country, and it is impossible to completely replace the existing
equipment with equipment from a new manufacturer. This means that product design needs to consider the coexistence of devices from different manufacturers - that is, it must be able to support the access of IoT devices from multiple manufacturers. The access of IoT devices needs to consider the compatibility of different manufacturers, and it needs to be able to access devices with similar functions from different manufacturers at the same time. How to solve the problem? Let’s start with an example from our lives
發表於 2024-2-20 17:43:57
收藏